|Kelly LeBrock Sexy Pics & Clips at Mr. Skin!|
We have a video for Kelly LeBrock Signup FREE To Watch!
Kelly LeBrock's Sexy Filmography
Movies this celebrity has appeared sexy or nude in...
|1984||Woman in Red, The||9 Reviews|
nudity reviews for Kelly LeBrock member submitted
Wow.What really makes this scene great is that it is SOOOOOO unexpected. One moment she's sitting on a couch covering herself up, the next, whoosh.. off with her (bottom part) robe and her lower torso in all it's glory!!! (it's brief, but REALLY good though).Unusually, she doesn't show us her breasts, which is strange considering she showed something must actresses stay away from showing...But she does look good standing around in tight panties, and it's amazing to see this in a PG-13 movie!
when she jumps out of bed and the sheet fails to cover everything is when you see her bottom half naked . this was probibly an accident ( I bet she didn't mean to show everything ) it's quick so you might have to pause it to get a good look
in her condo before hubby gets back
This is one of those shocking nude scenes considering its PG-13 rating. I mean 'Airplane' was PG and it had breast shots. And 'Sheena' was only PG and had Tanya Roberts nude for lengthy amounts of time in good lighting, except no bush. And here 'Woman in Red' has Le Brock briefly flash her pussy along with some brief breasts with only a PG-13 rating. Sometimes I wonder why movies that are rated higher than an R, such as Unrated Director's Cut versions, sometimes are to shy to even have bush shots. For example 'Poison Ivy' and its sequels. Why slap on the UR which is equal to NC-17 in some ways when there is no full frontal nudity? Anyhow, Kelly is sexy and very erotic in this movie. Great!
Shows her bush by the bed ...
I have to say that I agree with the previous reviewer who wonders if Kelly "really intended" to show us her beautiful bush ? The way she holds the bed-cover to hide her boobs, I'm sure she had "absolutely no intention" of flashing her dark furry bush, which is clearly more desireable to see ! The only thing that does puzzle me though, is why she wouldn't have reviewed her nude scene during final editing, and then asked for her bush-flash to be cut out ? Perhaps she didn't review the film before release, or maybe she is "just a tease", and left it in quite intentionally, cos she new exactly how HOT she looked, and just how hot us boys would get ? Either way ..... THANKS KELLY !!!
Bush Shot Response.
In response to the other reviewers questions as to why a bush shot made it onto a PG-13 rated film. When the PG-13 rating was enacted by the MPAA in 1984 (in response to complaints concerning the graphic "heart ripping" scene in INDIANA JONES...TEMPLE OF DOOM, which was rated PG), this film along with RED DAWN and DREAMSCAPE, were one of the first films to be released PG-13 in the U.S. My theory is that the studios were "testing the waters" with the MPAA, so to speak. Anyone who has seen RED DAWN will see the that violence in THAT film was on a R rated (graphic) level. The same with the bush shot in this film. Of course, in later years PG-13 nudity is pretty much limited to brief tits and ass shots (TITANIC is a good example). In my opinion, the PG-13 and NC-17 ratings are pretty useless ratings anyway. But, what are you gonna do? I guess we're stuck with it. Oh yeah, nice bush shot.
Though quick, it was nice to see her beaver! YUMMY!!
brief full frontal nudity of young Kelly
This is 'PG-13' rated, but Kelly shows briefly her body.
not much but hot
bush side of ass and breasts very breif but she is hot